Sunday, July 15, 2012

Victim Blaming and Rape Myth Acceptance


      Rape myth acceptance is the prevalence of misinformation about rape, women, and sexual assault in our society. This misinformation has lead to women second guessing their judgement and emotions. Victim blaming, also known as gaslighting, can make it difficult for women (and other victims) to perceive things correctly. Misinformation in our society has lead to a certain level of judgement of those who have been sexually assaulted. The prevalence of rape myths makes it even more difficult to differentiate between what is and is not true. Rape victims are often blamed because of rape myth acceptance, leading to low reporting of rape and lower emotional expression by women.
     Rape myth acceptance, or RMA, occurs when someone holds stereotypical beliefs about rape and sexual assault. This includes things such as thinking that because a woman is wearing a short skirt, she's “asking for it” or thinking it's okay to have sexual contact with someone has had too much to drink as long as he or she does not say no. Our society has a rather high RMA, causing confusion and misunderstanding among both men and women and justification for sexual assault when there should be none. In their essay “Stop Blaming the Victim: A Meta-Analysis on Rape Myths”, Suarez and Gadella explain “Burt operationalized and defined rape myths as false beliefs about rape, rape victims, and perpetrators. Lonsway and Fitzgerald further examined gender differences of the construct and indicated that rape myths allow men to justify rape and women to minimize personal vulnerability” (2011). Women downplaying their emotions often makes it difficult for both themselves and others to tell if there has in factbeen an incidence of sexual assault. Modern society, especially in the United States, seems to have a moral gray area when it comes to sexual assault. There is a distinct inability to perceive if something is sexual assault if it falls within that moral gray area, such as if you have sexual contact with someone who is intoxicated or under the influence of drugs. Society participates in the invalidation of a victim's emotions when it assumes that the victim did something to encourage the assault. The belief that because the victim didn't say no, his or her consent was given is an incredibly common misconception.
      Most people who have a high RMA think coercion is sometimes acceptable while those with a low RMA do not. Morry and Winkler point out that “Coercive behaviour against women is not generally acceptable. Low RMA participants indicated that coercion was never acceptable across common dating situations. Participants high in rape myth beliefs though indicated that at times coercion was acceptable” (190). Options of coercion can be anything from pressuring someone into having sexual contact to assuming because someone has not said no, they are consenting. In the stereotypical high school movie, there is usually at least one example of coercion. The boyfriend is with his girlfriend in the back seat, trying to convince her to have sex. She's hesitant and he says something along the lines of if you loved me, you'd do it. This is probably the most common form of coercion, a practice that most of us have been exposed to at some point. If not in real life, you may have been exposed to it by stories from friends or, again, the movies. Coercion blurs the lines between what is and is not consent, making it difficult for victims to deal with their conflicting emotions as they try to figure out what has happened.
      Rape myths often prevent women from reporting instances of sexual assault. Suarez and Gadalla explain that “An important factor that discourages rape victims from reporting is the non-supportive reactions that they often encounter after disclosing the assault. Research findings indicate that rape victims may experience postrape trauma as a result of those nonsupportive reactions” (2011). Again, this circles back around to the problem of blaming the victim. A woman walking home alone at night, a woman wearing a short skirt, or a woman dancing suggestively are all common reasons people give for a woman not protecting herself. There is a very large focus on how the victim's behaviors may have influenced the sexual assault, suggesting it was the victim's fault or the victim should have known better. Many sexual assault survivors suffer psychological problems because of the unwillingness of society to acknowledge that it wasn't their fault. This, often times, stops victims from reporting that they've been sexually assaulted because they know what has happened in the past to other victims of sexual assault. They are forced to choose between reporting it and being judged heavily or suffering in silence, being judged only by themselves.
      There is also a very strong link between acceptance of sexual assault and other types of violence. As Suarez and Gadella assert, “structural violence, therefore, facilitates the analysis of how societal tolerance justifies and legitimates rape as well as other expressions of oppression and violence towards women” (2014). Violence towards women on TV, in music, and even in society itself gives a certain justification to all actions of violence towards women. It's not so much that society approves of violence towards women but more that society is resigned to the fact that it exists and doesn't see that there can be anything done about it unless women change how they behave. This, again, leads to blaming the woman, and also causes the practice of “slut shaming”. This creates an either/or reaction in our society. If a woman has not had sex, she's often viewed as a tease, but if a woman expresses her sexuality in a way that is deemed “unacceptable” by society (often by engaging in premarital sexual activities), she's labeled a “slut” or a “whore”. This again creates confusion amongst women in the country about what they are or are not defined as by society.
      Gender provides a large difference in rape myth acceptance with men being more likely
to have a high RMA. “Gender showed the strongest relationship with RMA...with men
displaying significantly higher endorsement of RMA than women” claim Suarez and Gadella (2019). This is possibly explained by the ratio of personally knowing someone who has been a victim of sexual assault. Women tend to have more female friends, and females are more likely to be sexually assaulted than men. Because of this, they tend to be more informed about what is defined as sexual assault and how to avoid sexual assault as best as they can. Men, on the other hand, don't particularly have to worry about sexual assault (except in the cases of homosexual and trans* men). Men are lucky enough to live in a society that teaches “don't get raped” instead of “don't rape”, absolving them of a lot of the responsibility if a rape does happen. Society likes to believe that it blames the rapist, and it does to a point, but the victims take a large, undeserved piece of that blame.
      Rape myths lead to men viewing rape differently, changing their perceptions of what is and is not rape. As Morry and Winkler suggest, “...males should be more likely than females to perceive the victims as responsible and less likely to view the incident as rape” (189). This again brings us back to the moral gray area. The perception of what is and is not rape becomes much more difficult when jokes about rape and sexual assault are common. A commonly used phrase amongst many teenage boys, in particular, is “if she's not saying no, she's saying yes”. This blurs what is and is not consent, and causes a higher rate of sexual assault, especially date rape.
      Because of the prevalence of rape myths, our society has been labeled by some as a “rape culture”, showing that modern society accepts (or at least expects) rape on an unprecedented level. “North American society has been called a 'rape culture'. However, the anthropologist Peggy Sanday made clear that rape-free and rape-prone societies are achievable, and they can even coexist within a large societal context” (Suarez and Gadella 2028). Looking at music lyrics is one of the easiest ways to see why our society is a rape culture. Again, this doesn't always involve songs condoning rape but also songs that are “slut shaming”. A good example of “slut shaming” in popular culture is the song “Stupid Hoe” by Nicki Minaj. The entire song is about two women fighting over a man. A common theme in pop music, there is almost always a level of slut shaming, though not always as obvious as in this song. The chorus consists of only the words “you a stupid hoe, you a, you a stupid hoe”. Words like slut, whore, and hoe are all ways to drag women down by commenting on their sexual expression, suggesting that because they have had sexual relations, they are less worthy as individuals. This causes perceptions of women to change, making them seem like nothing more than trophies to own that someone has a right to. Slut shaming, in effect, leads to a wider acceptance of rape because it dehumanizes women.
      Television also contributes to a higher RMA. Kahlor and Eastin offer that “...the study supports the suggestion that general television consumption is related significantly to first- and second-order rape myth beliefs among adult men and women beyond the college student population” (225). The more television a person watches, the more likely that person is to have a higher RMA. We are constantly bombarded with images of violence on television, and there is almost always a layer of misogyny in the programming. Television, on a whole, influences our beliefs more than almost anything else.
      Clearly there is a problem in modern society with rape myth acceptance. The most effective solution in preventing sexual violence and rape myth acceptance is simply education. For example, a study was done with high school students and sexual assault and coercion awareness. Instead of teaching self defense, a common sexual assault prevention technique, the study focused on teaching how to recognize sexual assault and coercion. Over a number of days, the students were educated by different methods: videos, interactive exercises, seeing models of acceptable behavior, and even concrete definitions. This practice is highlighted in the article Evaluating a Prevention Program for Teenagers on Sexual Coercion: A Differential Effectiveness Approach by Pacifici, Stoolmiller, and Nelson:
      Benefits were apparent only for those students who, initially, were considered relatively more at risk.  Specifically, for all indicators of coercive sexual attitudes, students at or above the prescore mean benefited from the intervention, whereas those below did not. Moreover, although female adolescents were less tolerant of sexual coercion than male adolescents at baseline, outcomes were similar across gender (557).
      The success of the study was largely dependent on students' viewpoints before and after. Giving the information in several ways, not just one, provided a way for everyone to understand what the problem was and why it was a problem, making this an effective method in preventing sexual violence and rape myths. Because of the success of this and other studies, it would be a valid solution to adult rape myth acceptance. Though this study dealt specifically with teens, the methods would most likely work for most people regardless of age.
      Another method of education that is important in decreasing RMA and sexual assault is bystander education. Victims aren't just responsible for preventing sexual assault; the community is too. The problem with bystander involvement is, again, an issue with education. Education on what is and is not sexual assault and coercion will not just help stop people from being sexually assaulted, but it also will provide the framework for intervention. McMahon and Banyard report that “Some sexual violence prevention programs include the discussion of engaging in proactive opportunities” (10). By speaking up even just against sexist language or slut shaming, sexual assault can sometimes be prevented. If the potential aggressor realizes that his or her actions are not accepted by society, he or she may rethink his or her actions.
      The prevalence of rape myth acceptance, victim blaming, and slut shaming in our society creates problems for sexual assault victims. As women's emotions are downplayed, men continue to hold more power over them, making it difficult for women to rise up as equals. Until we as Americans accept that there is a large problem, sexual assault will continue to occur.  Certain songs and television shows that both treat women as commodities and constantly put women down also contribute to this problem. Education on what is and is not sexual assault and what is and is not a rape myth is imperative in reducing the prevalence of sexual assault and victim blaming in our society. Until we as a society address this issue, it will continue to be a large problem. By educating everyone, including our youth, on sexual assault, we can reduce the number of aggressors and increase the percentage of aggressors prosecuted for their actions.


REFERENCES
Kahlor, LeeAnn and Eastin, Matthew S. "Television's Role in the Culture of Violence towards     Women: A Study of Television Viewing and the Cultivation of Rape Myth Acceptance in the United States." Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media. 55. (2011): 215-31. Print.
McMahon, Sarah and Banyard, Victoria L. "When Can I help? A Conceptual Framework for the Prevention of Sexual Violence Through Bystander Intervention." Trauma Violence Abuse. 13.3 (2012): 3-14. Print.
Morry, Marian M. and Winkler, Erica. “Student Acceptance and Expectcation of Sexual Assault.” Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science. 33.3 (2001): 188-92. Print.
Pacifici, Caesar, Stoolmiller, Mike , and Nelson, Carol. "Evaluating a Prevention Program for Teenagers on Sexual Coercion: A Differential Effectiveness Approach." Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 69.3 (2001): 552-59. Print.
Suarez, Eliana and Gadalla, Tahany M. “Stop Blaming the Victim: A Meta-Analysis on Rape Myths.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 25.11 (2010): 2011-26. Print.